Enviar artigo via e-mail Contemporary conversations on authorship in Applied Linguistics: a literature review
Resumo
Authorship attribution has been a concern across disciplines, from Information Science (MIRANDA et al, 2007; VANZ; STUMPF, 2010) to Medicine (GRIEGER, 2005; MONTEIRO, 2004; PETROIANU, 2002). With this in mind, we aim at providing an overview on Conversations (GEE, 1999) about authorship in the field of Applied Linguistics from 2012 to 2015. Drawing on Critical Discourse Analysis (FAIRCLOUGH, 1992, 2003), we review nine articles published in well-known Applied Linguistics journals. The results indicated that there are four different perspectives from which authorship is addressed: dialogicity, responsibility, ideological positioning and intellectual property. Quoting and paraphrasing were the most cited practices in association with the concept of dialogicity as a form of exercising authorship in the academic context.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
REFERENCES
Arán, Pampa Olga. The question of the author in Bakhtin. Bakhtiniana, Rev. Estud. Discurso, São Paulo, Número Especial, p. 4-25, 2014.
Araújo, Júlio César; Dieb, Messias. Authorship and deontology: mediation of ethical principles and literacy practices in academic writing using a virtual forum. RBLA, Belo Horizonte, v. 13, n. 1, p. 83-104, 2013.
Bastalich, Wendy; Behrend, Monica; Bloomfield, Robert. Is non-subject based research training a “waste of time”, good only for the development of professional skills? An academic literacies perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, Routledge: Londres, n. 4, v. 19, p. 373-384, 2014.
Bernardino, Cibele Gadelha. Academic article: interpersonal meanings construction. RBLA, Belo Horizonte, v. 12, n. 3, p. 463-492, 2012.
Biagioli, Mario. Recycling texts or stealing time?: Plagiarism, authorship, and credit in science. International Journal of Cultural Property, p. 453-476, 2012.
Bordieu, Pierre. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. In: BIAGIOLI, M. (Org.). The Science Studies Reader. Nova Iorque: Routledge, 1999.
Carneiro, Marco Antonio; Cangussú, Silvia; Fernandes, Wilson. Ethical Abuses in the Authorship of Scientific Papers. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, p. 1-5, 2007.
Casanave, Christine Pears. Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahvah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.
Christofe, Lilian. Intertextualidade e plágio: questões de linguagem e autoria. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 1996.
Cope, Bill; Kalantzis, Mary. Introduction: how a genre approach to literacy can transform the way writing is taught. In: Cope, Bill; Kalantzis, Mary (Eds.). The powers of literacy: a genre approach to teaching writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993.
Fairclough, Norman. Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London, New York: Routledge, 2003.
___. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
Fairclough, Norman.; Wodak, Ruth. Critical discourse analysis. In: VAN DIJK, T. A. (Ed.). Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage, p. 258-284, 1997.
Freitas, Ana Beatriz Machado de. Enunciation and authorship through alternative communication and dialogue mediation. RBLA, Belo Horizonte, v. 12, n. 1, p. 165-180, 2012.
Garcia, Carla Costa; Martrucelli, Cristina Ribeiro Nabuco; Rossilho, Marilisa de Melo Freire; Denardin, Odilon Victor Porto. Autoria em artigos científicos: os novos desafios. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, p. 559-567, 2010.
Gee, James Paul. How to do discourse analysis: a toolkit. New York: Routledge, 2011.
Grieger, Maria Christina Anna. Authorship: an ethical dilemma of science. São Paulo Medical Journal , p. 242-6, 2005.
HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander Kirkwood; MATTHIESSEN, C. M. I. M. An introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd. ed. London: Hodder Education, 2004.
___. An introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th. ed. London: Edward Arnold, 2014.
HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander Kirkwood; HASAN, Ruqaiya. Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Hoey, John. Who wrote this paper anyway? The new Vancouver Group statement refines the definition of authorship. JAMC, p. 716-7, 2000.
Howard, Rebecca Moore. Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. National Council of Teachers of English, v. 57, n. 7, p. 788-806, 1995.
Kerbauy, Rachel Rodrigues. Autoria e coautoria: efeitos negativos e positivos. Estudos de Psicologia, Campinas, p. 89-94, 2005.
Lave, Jean; Wenger, Etienne. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Lea, Mary; Street, Brian. Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. In: Studies in Higher Education. Abindgon, UK. v. 23, n. 2, p. 157-172, 1998.
Meurer, José Luiz. Ampliando a noção de contexto na Linguística Sistêmico-Funcional e na Análise Crítica do Discurso. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, Tubarão, v. 4, n.esp, p. 133-157, 2004.
Miranda, Antonio; Simeão, Elmira; Mueller, Suzana. Autoria coletiva, autoria ontológica e intertextualidade: aspectos conceituais e tecnológicos. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v. 36, n. 2, p. 35-45, 2007.
Monteiro, Rosangela; Jatene, Fabio Biscegli; Goldenberg, Saul; Población, Dinah Aguiar; Pellizzon, Rosely de Fátima. Critérios de autoria em trabalhos científicos: um assunto polêmico e delicado. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, v. 19, n. 4, 2004.
Moraes, Érika de. Mona Lisa: sentidos múltiplos de um sorriso enigmático. DELTA, vol. 29, no.Especial, p.443-465, 2013.
Motta-Roth, Désiree. Letramento acadêmico/científico e participação periférica legítima em comunidades de produção de conhecimento. Projeto de Pesquisa Bolsa PQ-CNPq nº 309668/2013-1, 2013.
Pereira, Regina Celi Mendes; Leitão, Poliana Dayse Vasconcelos. Apreensão do discurso de outrem e autoria em gêneros acadêmico-científicos. Veredas online, Juiz de Fora, v. 19, n. 2, p. 195-208, 2015.
Petroianu, Andy. Autoria de um trabalho científico. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, São Paulo, v. 8, n. 1, p. 60-65, 2002.
Russell, David. Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, v. 14, n. 4, p. 504-554, 1997.
Salgado, Luciana Salazar; Gatti, Márcio Antônio. Personagens infantis de tiras cômicas em suportes diversos: uma questão de circulação, aforização e estereotipia. DELTA, vol. 29, no. spe, p.517-534, 2013.
Silveira, Ana Paula Kuczmynda da. Carnavalização e New Journalism: O agenciamento da emoção e do ethos em crônicas da esfera jornalística. DELTA, vol.30, no.2, p.181-196, 2014.
Swales, John; Feak, Christine. English in today’s research world: a writing guide. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2000.
Volosinov, Valentin Nikolaevich. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trad. Ladislav Matejka and Irwin R. Titunik. New York; London: Seminar Press, 1973 [1929].
WENGER, Etienne. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1998.
Witter, Geraldina Porto. Ética e autoria na produção textual científica. Informação & Informação, v. 15, n. esp., p. 131-144, 2010.
Vanz, Samile Andrea de Souza.; Stumpf, Ida Regina Chittó. Colaboração científica: revisão teórico-conceitual. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v.15, n.2, p.42-55, 2010.
Zart, Lidia Helena Muller; Fraga, Dinorá Moraes de. Technology tools for investigation of authorship. RBLA, Belo Horizonte, v. 13, n. 1, p. 67-83, 2013.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22168/2237-6321.7.7.2.604-621
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
